Boundaries of Our Universe

I’m posting this from the site to save the explanation of what relationships are all about, what systems in the universe are all about, and the, perhaps, most important aspects of such systems.

When did time really begin? Did time begin before or after the beginning of the universe?

Nothing, including space-time, exists except if there is a relationship.

What is the simplest of relationships in our universe? The simplest of relationships is represented by a near locality (near position), a near singularity, a near point. Why do I use the word “near?” Because if there were a pure singularity source in the universe, a pure locality, a point, then there would only be one thing, one magnitude, and for something to exist (in our physical universe), it must be in relationship with something else: there must be a change, a change boundary (for example: temperature changes across it, when temperature changes, we call that relationship/relationship-boundary/change-boundary “heat.”)

The size of a relationship boundary at any time represents our universe (what can be, or exist, or behave, or experience it).

Our universe is filled with potential, but it doesn’t exist explicitly (only implicitly: see works of David Bohm) when relationship boundaries are condensed out of it.

Many ask where is the outer boundary, when they think of the expansion of the universe as a giant balloon being blown up. But universal boundaries (universal relationship boundaries) exist (us) inside a mathematical set of statistical potentials. Statistical potentials determine the probabilities of the physical laws of our universe.

So, boundaries become more and more complex. The particles condensed therein relate to form atoms (atomic-tensions/atomic-fields), molecules (molecular-tensions/molecular-fields), all the way to the experiences of cellular cephalization.

All systems (relationship change boundaries) in our universe have at least four major INDIVISIBLE characteristics: FORM (geometric shape/size/curvature), FUNCTION (behavior/spacetial-path), DURATION (length of path in time), and EXPERIENCE.

Humans use clocks (external to them) to objectively measure their experiences. But most systems have a way of internally measuring theirs. Our cells go through day and night cycles that help them function effectively.

To answer your question, based on the above understanding: TIME/DURATION started at the same time form and function started: at the very beginning of the universe, because these major aspects of the universe (universal subsystems): FORM/FUNCTION/DURATION/EXPERIENCE spontaneously existed all together—all at once—somehow fused!

2 thoughts

  1. I’ve always thought of time as a human construct to prevent everything from happening at once. I’m kidding, but I think phyics would be better if they renamed “time” and called it something else. It would make more sense to imagine time as a measurement than as a dimension.

    • Thanks, DJ.

      As you see i’ve called time the duration of a system. Near the singularity source of our universe (as with zero points) energy comes into and out of existence, since durations are short. So in this posting, I define any bounded subsystem of our universe as having the measurable aspects of FORM/FUNCTION/DURATION/EXPERIENCE. These aspects cannot be teased apart by objectivity, but are in close-knit relationship to the system being studied.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: